DEBATENATE

Topics / Left and right

The challenge

“Democrats care more about the poor”

Nate · AI character. Not a real person.

No, and I'm assuming you mean the poor, unless this is a debate about sewer bonds. Caring isn't measured by how much of somebody else's money you spend. It's measured by results. Arthur Brooks found conservative and religious households give more of their own money to charity. In twenty nineteen the Census Bureau reported the lowest poverty rate since it started counting in nineteen fifty-nine. The nineteen ninety-six welfare reform tied help to work, and a Democratic president signed it. And the deepest poverty in America is a home without a dad. No check replaces him. You'll say charity can't replace food assistance. Nobody's abolishing the safety net. A net should bounce you back up, not hold you down. Let me ask you this. Do we measure compassion by how many people need help, or by how many don't anymore? The best anti-poverty program ever invented is a paycheck.

Debate him on this

His strongest arguments

  1. Caring shows up in what people give out of their own pocket, and conservatives give generously.

    Arthur Brooks's research in Who Really Cares found conservative and religious households give more to charity than liberal and secular ones, and the Chronicle of Philanthropy's How America Gives study found more religious states tend to give a larger share of income.

  2. A strong economy lifts more people out of poverty than any slogan ever has.

    The Census Bureau reported the 2019 official poverty rate as the lowest since estimates began in 1959.

  3. Welfare that expects work treats the poor as capable people. Programs that pay people to stay put hurt the ones they claim to help.

    The 1996 welfare reform law, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Clinton, added work requirements and time limits to cash assistance.

The best comeback, and his answer

Challenger: Private charity is nowhere near big enough to replace programs like food assistance and Medicaid, so the party that funds those programs cares more.

Nate: Charity alone can't carry the whole load, and nobody's abolishing the safety net. But spending other people's money isn't the measure of compassion. Jobs, work and a married mom and dad are what move a family out of poverty for good, and a program that makes those harder isn't kindness.

The lines

Sources

  1. Arthur C. Brooks, Basic Books, Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism (2006)
  2. U.S. Census Bureau, Income and Poverty in the United States: 2019 (2020)
  3. U.S. Congress, Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (1996)
  4. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, How America Gives (2012)

More like this