DEBATENATE

Topics / Left and right

The challenge

“The 2020 election was completely secure and questioning it is dangerous”

Nate · AI character. Not a real person.

Questioning an election isn't dangerous. Banning the questions is. Start with what's settled. The legal challenges failed in court, and Congress certified the result the way the Constitution lays out. Now the questions still worth asking. In twenty twenty, officials and courts rewrote mail voting rules on the fly. Pennsylvania's supreme court added three days to the ballot deadline the legislature had set. Private donors put about three hundred fifty million dollars into public election offices. And weeks before the vote, Twitter blocked a New York Post story, which its own chief later called a mistake. You'll say asking undermines trust. Audits build trust. Georgia recounted every paper ballot by hand, the result held, and that settled more than any lecture. Let me ask you this. When has telling people to stop asking ever made them trust you more? Sunlight never hurt an honest count.

Debate him on this

His strongest arguments

  1. Emergency rule changes came from officials and courts instead of legislatures. Who gets to write election rules is a real constitutional question, and asking it isn't an attack on anybody.

    In September 2020 the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar, extended the deadline for receiving mail ballots by three days beyond the date set in state law. In 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the case.

  2. Private money ran through public election offices in 2020. That isn't fraud, and it is a reasonable thing for citizens to question.

    Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan donated about 350 million dollars to the Center for Tech and Civic Life, which made grants to local election offices for the 2020 election.

  3. Transparency settles what censorship can't. The count that got checked by hand is the one nobody serious still argues about.

    In November 2020 Georgia conducted a full hand count of its paper ballots in the presidential race as a risk-limiting audit, and it confirmed the original outcome.

The best comeback, and his answer

Challenger: More than sixty lawsuits failed, federal officials called it the most secure election in American history, and the doubts ended in a riot at the Capitol. That is why the questioning is dangerous.

Nate: The lawsuits failed and the result was certified. I said so first. And violence is wrong, full stop. But the answer to a wrong claim is evidence in the open, the way Georgia's hand count answered it. A bipartisan commission led by Jimmy Carter and James Baker warned back in two thousand five that absentee ballots are the largest source of potential voter fraud. Asking how they're handled isn't an attack on democracy. It's maintenance.

What he grants the other side

The legal challenges to the 2020 result failed in court, and the result was lawfully certified.

The lines

Sources

  1. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar (2020)
  2. Associated Press and widely reported, Chan Zuckerberg donations of about $350 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life for 2020 election administration grants (2020)
  3. Georgia Secretary of State, Risk-Limiting Audit Report: Georgia Presidential Contest, November 2020 (2020)
  4. U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Hearing: Breaking the News: Censorship, Suppression, and the 2020 Election (testimony of Jack Dorsey) (2020)
  5. Commission on Federal Election Reform (Carter-Baker Commission), Building Confidence in U.S. Elections (2005)
  6. U.S. Congress, Congressional Record, counting of electoral votes, January 6-7, 2021 (2021)

More like this