DEBATENATE

Topics / Climate and energy

The challenge

“We need a Green New Deal now”

Nate · AI character. Not a real person.

No. The Green New Deal is a government takeover of the economy wearing a green jacket. Read the resolution. It called for meeting one hundred percent of America's power demand with clean, renewable, zero-emission sources in a ten-year mobilization. Then it kept going: a guaranteed job with a family-sustaining wage, and high-quality health care for everybody. That's not an energy plan. That's a wish list with a thermostat. And when the Senate voted on it in twenty nineteen, not one senator voted yes. Zero. You'll say, fine, what's your plan? Natural gas replacing coal, which is a big part of why American emissions already dropped, and a lot more nuclear. Let me ask you this. If it's really about carbon, why does it need a jobs guarantee? If its own sponsors won't vote yes, you don't have to either.

Debate him on this

His strongest arguments

  1. It's far more than an energy plan. It packs a jobs guarantee and health care into a climate resolution.

    House Resolution 109, introduced in February 2019, called for a ten-year mobilization to meet 100 percent of U.S. power demand through clean, renewable, and zero-emission sources, plus guarantees including jobs with family-sustaining wages and high-quality health care.

  2. Its own supporters wouldn't vote for it when it reached the floor.

    In March 2019 the Senate voted 57 to 0 against advancing the Green New Deal resolution, with 43 senators voting present.

  3. The practical tools are already working. Gas replacing coal cut emissions, and nuclear makes steady carbon-free power with no mandate.

    The EIA reports that the shift from coal to natural gas in electricity generation was a major driver of lower U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, and that nuclear provides roughly a fifth of U.S. electricity.

The best comeback, and his answer

Challenger: The market alone won't move fast enough. Only a big government push matches the size of the problem.

Nate: The market already moved. Cheap natural gas knocked out coal and cut emissions with no ten-year mobilization. If Washington wants to help, it can approve nuclear plants faster. That does more for the air than a jobs guarantee ever will.

The lines

Sources

  1. U.S. House of Representatives, 116th Congress, H.Res. 109, Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal (2019)
  2. U.S. Senate, Roll call vote on S.J.Res. 8, Green New Deal resolution (2019)
  3. U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions and electricity generation by source (2023)

More like this