DEBATENATE

Topics / Guns

The challenge

“Nobody needs an AR-15”

Nate · AI character. Not a real person.

Need has nothing to do with it. It's the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs. The Second Amendment was written by men who had just fought a government, so free citizens would never be helpless before one, and the Supreme Court in Heller said self-defense is central to it too. In Bruen the Court threw out New York's rule that you had to prove a special need to carry a gun. And in FBI data for twenty nineteen, rifles of every kind were used in fewer murders than knives. You'll bring up mass shootings, and those are evil. But a Justice Department-funded study of the ten-year federal ban couldn't clearly credit it with reducing gun violence. Let me ask you this: who decides what you need, and what happens when they decide you don't? Rights don't come with a permission slip.

Debate him on this

His strongest arguments

  1. A constitutional right doesn't depend on proving need to a government official. The Supreme Court threw out exactly that kind of test.

    In New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, decided in 2022, the Supreme Court struck down New York's requirement that applicants show proper cause, meaning a special need, to carry a handgun in public.

  2. The Second Amendment protects arms in common use for lawful purposes, and the AR-15 is one of the most common rifles in America.

    District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008 held that the Second Amendment protects weapons in common use by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes like self-defense.

  3. Rifles are a small slice of American murders. Going after one popular rifle misses where the violence actually is.

    FBI expanded homicide data for 2019 showed rifles of all types were used in fewer murders than knives or cutting instruments, and fewer than hands, fists and feet.

The best comeback, and his answer

Challenger: AR-15-style rifles have been used in several of the deadliest mass shootings in American history, so even if they're rare in everyday crime, they enable the worst massacres.

Nate: Those attacks are evil, and every victim matters. But the country banned these rifles for ten years, and the Justice Department's own funded evaluation couldn't clearly credit the ban with reducing gun violence. Disarming millions of people who did nothing wrong doesn't touch the one man who already decided to break every law we have.

What he grants the other side

AR-15-style rifles have been used in some of the worst mass shootings in our history.

The lines

Sources

  1. U.S. Supreme Court, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022)
  2. U.S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
  3. FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program, Crime in the United States 2019, Expanded Homicide Data Table 8 (2020)
  4. Christopher S. Koper, report to the National Institute of Justice, An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003 (2004)

More like this