DEBATENATE

Topics / Guns

The challenge

“Universal background checks and red flag laws are common sense”

Nate · AI character. Not a real person.

No. Common sense has to actually work, and it has to respect due process. Every sale by a licensed dealer already goes through a background check under the Brady Act. When the Justice Department surveyed prisoners who had a gun during their crime, the biggest share got it off the street or the underground market, and very few at a gun show. Criminals don't fill out forms. And you can't enforce checks on private sales without knowing who owns what. That's a registry, and federal law forbids one. Red flag laws are worse. In many states a judge can order your guns taken before you ever get to speak. You'll say there's a hearing later. Later is the problem. Let me ask you this: would you accept punishment first and the hearing second for your speech or your church? Common sense starts with due process.

Debate him on this

His strongest arguments

  1. Background checks already cover every sale by a licensed dealer. The universal version mostly lands on private transfers between law-abiding people.

    The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 established background checks for sales by federally licensed dealers, run since 1998 through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

  2. Criminals don't shop where the checks happen. Expanding checks burdens the lawful while the street market carries on.

    The Bureau of Justice Statistics' 2016 Survey of Prison Inmates found the largest share of prisoners who had a gun during their offense got it off the street or from the underground market, and only a very small share obtained it at a gun show.

  3. You can't verify a universal check without knowing who owned the gun before. That points to a registry. And red flag laws act before the accused says a word.

    The Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 bars the federal government from creating a registry of firearms or owners; Florida's risk protection order law, like many state red flag laws, allows a temporary ex parte order before the respondent's hearing.

The best comeback, and his answer

Challenger: Due process does exist in red flag laws: there's a full hearing within days, and a temporary order is the only way to stop someone who is about to act.

Nate: The hearing comes after the guns are gone, often on one person's word, and the burden lands on a man who hasn't been charged with anything. That's backwards. If somebody is truly an imminent danger, we already have arrest, involuntary evaluation and protective orders, and those come with stronger protections.

What he grants the other side

A court should be able to disarm a proven threat after a real hearing.

The lines

Sources

  1. U.S. Congress, Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Public Law 103-159 (1993)
  2. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Source and Use of Firearms Involved in Crimes: Survey of Prison Inmates, 2016 (2019)
  3. U.S. Congress, Firearm Owners Protection Act, Public Law 99-308 (1986)
  4. Florida Legislature, Florida Statutes Section 790.401, Risk Protection Orders (2018)

More like this